GRAIL
Telemedicine test ordering workflow
GRAIL needed to expand its Galleri cancer screening test from a benefits-only ordering flow to a direct-to-consumer onboarding system. This project redesigned and rearchitected the end-to-end ordering experience to accommodate the complexity of telemedicine, regulatory, and cross-functional constraints while reducing friction for patients.
27.3%
Increase in completed test orders from telemedicine channel
30%
Faster time to complete the ordering workflow
52%
Decline in login related support tickets
01 — Context
Expanding Galleri to the general public
GRAIL initially offered its early cancer detection test only through employer benefits programs or with providers directly. As the company expanded to nationwide direct-to-consumer access, the ordering experience became the primary acquisition funnel.
The business goal
- Increase activation and successful order completion without compromising medical rigor or compliance.
The potential risk
- Opening access to the public dramatically increases potential friction, support burden, and abandonment which directly impacts revenue and trust.
02 — The Problem
A flow built for one model, asked to serve another
The test launched to the public with great momentum. Unfortunately, we were met with a lot of critical observations:
- Significant drop-off at account creation
- High volume of login-related support tickets
- Continued abandonment during medical intake
- Frustration with ~23 minute long form to submit
Two Friction clusters appeared
Account Creation
→
Portal Access
→
Medical Intake & Eligibility Screening
→
Order Submission
→
Testing Experience
→
Result Access
⚠ Users hit friction points at highlighted steps
- Mandatory account creation before even determining eligibility
- Long, convoluted intake flow mixing eligibility screening, medical questionnaire, and compliance requirements
The system was optimized for structured benefits access, not public onboarding.
03 — Key Insights
Research revealed two distinct key insights
I ran moderated usability sessions, analyzed metrics, and went onsite to different Galleri events to discover the root of the problem. This uncovered two points:
Insight 1
Users were being asked for full account commitment before they had even confirmed eligibility. This commitment was sequenced too early in the process. This was clear from the overwhelming amount of support tickets related to account creation/login that translated to no orders.
Insight 2
The intake was structured as a long-winded form but the content should functionally be a medical decision tree. We were exposing internal data architecture rather than guiding user progression.
💡 Key synthesis: This shifted our original hypothesis of the problem from "shorten the form" to "re-sequence the system."
04 — Constraints
What we were working within
Medical AffairsMedical Affairs defined the intake content and data. This was mandatory for data collection for future applications like clinical studies or FDA approval processes.
LegalLegal governed the copy, consent, terms, and result delivery language. They were also the experts in state laws and regulations to give guidance for very specific scenarios.
EngineeringEngineering enlightened the technical feasibilities of the changes and solutions. With the model of our infrastructure, they were a very prominent stakeholder.
Customer ExperienceCustomer Experience brought a lot of knowledge of the dependencies in the broader patient journey outside of the onboarding, intake, and software.
The design principle that guided every decision in this project
"Make it easy to get started. Then walk users through the complexity step-by-step."
05 — Design Changes · Change 1
Capturing user buy in immediately
Our hypothesis was that if we capture intent before requiring full account creation, abandonment will decrease. And so I made the following changes:
- Introduce guest checkout to capture the orders and buy in from user immediately
- Have the system create an account using the information provided on the intake form
- Implement passwordless magic-link authentication for seamless account creation and login experience
We realized the issue wasn't the account creation itself, but when it appeared. We were essentially asking for commitment before the users had confidence.
By allowing users to move forward first and formalize the account later, we aligned the system with natural decision-making: curiosity → clarity → commitment.
Impact · Change 1
~18%
Increase in order submissions and accounts successfully created
52%
Less login-related support tickets within 60 days
05 — Design Changes · Change 2
Turning a long form into a guided workflow
If users are guided with more structured steps and presented with eligibility gates early in the process, more users will complete their orders without feeling overwhelmed. With this theory in place, I made the following changes:
Before — 10 steps & 25-33 Questions
Account Creation
Login
Order Recipient
Consent
Basic Info
PCP Info
Clinical Info
Review
Payment Info
Order Submit
Orange steps = Areas with high friction and no clinical value for telemedicine
After — 7 steps & 15-18 Questions
Basic Info
Eligibility Info
Consent
Clinical Info
Review
Payment Info
Order Submit & Account Created
4 steps removed or consolidated — same clinical outcomes, less user burden
- Previously, all users had to complete the same 6 steps to even determine eligibility. Now, if a user is not eligible, they only need to complete the first step.
- Introduced progressive disclosure instead of presenting everything at once
- Consolidated redundant fields with the Medical Affairs team
- Organized sections around how patients think about their health, not how our systems store data
The problem wasn't the length but the structure and guidance.
When the form felt dense and clinical, patients hesitated. When it felt guided and sequential, they moved forward with confidence.
Impact · Changes 2
27.3%
Increase in telemedicine orders successfully submitted
~8 mins
Average reduction in time-to-confirmed-order per patient (~35%)
06 — Validation & Outcomes
What the data showed after launch
We launched the changes after thorough user testing to compare the redesigned flow against the legacy flow. Results were measured across completion rate, time-to-order, support ticket volume, and surveys.
Increase in confidence
The ~35% reduction in time to complete the form and 27.3% increase in successfully submitting an order was a strong indicator of increase in confidence and less hesitation.
Decrease in assistance needed
The 52% decrease in login related tickets showed a clear correlation of the way the changes streamlined not only the account creation process but also the login system.
The changes successfully shifted the experience from feeling overwhelming to feeling very structured. And importantly, we achieved this without compromising any medical or compliance requirements.
07 — Reflection
What I'd continue exploring
The biggest lesson from this project
With friction reduced at checkout, the logged in portal was open to a lot more opportunities to better the patient experience:
- Clear, assisted explanations of the test results
- Guide to next step after test results
- Test results history and ongoing health tracking
- Saved medical profiles for future orders
I'm proud that the work didn't just improve conversion but it also created a stronger foundation for long-term patient trust.